Search Engines vs LLMs

Search Engines vs LLMs

If you’ve ever typed a question into ChatGPT and expected it to behave like Google, you’re not alone. Many users treat large language models (LLMs) as upgraded search engines, only to become frustrated when the results fail to meet their expectations.

     

    The truth is, while both search engines and LLMs deal with information, they operate on fundamentally different principles. Search engines find existing information, while LLMs generate new text based on patterns in data. Knowing the difference is essential if you want to use each tool effectively and avoid wasting time.

    How Search Engines Work

    At their core, search engines are information retrieval systems. Their purpose is simple: help you find the most relevant information that already exists on the web.

    Here’s how they do it:

    Crawling & Indexing: Search engines send out crawlers (bots) to scan billions of web pages, cataloguing their content.

    Ranking Algorithms: When you type a query, algorithms like PageRank decide which results to show, based on authority, relevance, and freshness.

    Output: You get a list of links, snippets, or sometimes direct answers from featured panels.

    Strengths:

    • Accurate, because results come from published sources.
    • Always up to date.
    • Provides attribution so you can verify information.
     

    Limitations:

    • Overwhelming number of results.
    • Only as good as what exists online.
    • It only retrieves. It doesn’t generate new content.
     

    Analogy: A search engine is like a librarian. Ask a question, and they’ll point you to the right shelf, book, or article.

    How Large Language Models (LLMs) Work

    LLMs, like ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, work very differently. Their purpose isn’t to find documents, but to generate new text that looks and sounds human.

    Here’s how:

    Predictive Modelling: LLMs are trained on massive datasets, learning statistical relationships between words.

    Text Generation: Given a prompt, they predict the most likely next word, then the next, creating coherent responses.

    Versatility: They can draft essays, summarise long texts, write code, or even role-play conversations.

    Strengths:

    • Excellent for drafting and brainstorming.
    • Can adapt tone and style to match your request.
    • Useful for rephrasing, summarising, and creative work.
     

    Limitations:

    • Can "hallucinate" and confidently make up false details.
    • Knowledge stops at their training cut-off (not real-time).
    • Doesn’t automatically provide sources.
     

    Analogy: An LLM is like an improv storyteller. Give it a theme, and it will spin a coherent narrative based on what it has learned, but not by checking a book on the shelf.

    The Rise of Deep Research

    A new capability is changing the game: Deep Research.

    Some LLMs now come with browsing or retrieval features layered on top. This allows them to go beyond their static training data:

    How it works: The AI runs multiple queries, checks multiple sources, and synthesises the results.

    Why it matters: Instead of just generating based on past training, it can pull in fresh, real-time information.

    Result: You get more accurate, timely, and well-reasoned answers.

    Think of it as a hybrid between a search engine and an LLM: the AI not only finds information but also explains it in plain language.

    Key Differences and Why They Matter

    • Source vs. Generation: Search engines find information; LLMs create text.
    • Fact vs. Probability: Search aims for factual accuracy; LLMs aim for the most probable next word.
    • Attribution: Search provides sources; LLMs don’t by default (unless enhanced with Deep Research).
    • Currency: Search is real-time; standard LLMs are constrained by their last update. Hybrid LLMs with Deep Research bridge the gap.
     

    Practical Implications:

    • Use search engines when you need verified facts, current events, statistics, or to find specific documents.
    • Use LLMs for brainstorming, drafting, summarising, rephrasing, and creative generation.
    • Use Deep Research when you need the best of both worlds: fresh, accurate information synthesised into clear insights.
     

    FAQ – Common Questions About Search, LLMs, and Deep Research

    Q: Is ChatGPT a search engine?

    A: No. Standard AI doesn’t search the live internet. However, new Deep Research features are starting to combine both.

    Q: Which is more accurate?

    A: Search engines are usually more accurate for facts. Deep Research-equipped LLMs are improving, but they still need oversight.

    Q: Can AI give me sources?

    A: Only if you ask — and only if browsing or Deep Research is enabled.

    Q: Should I use both?

    A: Yes. Search for facts and recency. LLMs for creativity. Deep Research when you want a hybrid approach.

    Key Takeaways

    • Search engines retrieve, LLMs generate, Deep Research blends both.
    • Use search for facts and current events.
    • Use LLMs for drafting, summarising, and creativity.
    • Use Deep Research for accurate, up-to-date synthesis.
     

    Conclusion

    Search engines and LLMs are not competitors; they’re complementary. Treating ChatGPT like Google sets you up for disappointment. But now, with Deep Research, the lines are blurring — and we’re entering a world where AI can both look things up and explain them in plain English.

    👉 For more practical AI workflows and prompt examples, subscribe to The Intelligent Playbook — a free newsletter with real-world strategies for non-technical people. Share it with a friend who wants to use AI more effectively.

    Note on Accuracy

    AI tools evolve quickly. Techniques for prompting may change as models improve.

    Always experiment and refine your approach to get the best results.